Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 17(3): e0264260, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reports on medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infections largely lack quantification of incidence and relative risk. We describe the rationale and methods of the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Registry (INSPIRE) that combines patient-reported outcomes with data from digital health records to understand predictors and impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: INSPIRE is a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study of individuals with symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in eight regions across the US. Adults are eligible for enrollment if they are fluent in English or Spanish, reported symptoms suggestive of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and if they are within 42 days of having a SARS-CoV-2 viral test (i.e., nucleic acid amplification test or antigen test), regardless of test results. Recruitment occurs in-person, by phone or email, and through online advertisement. A secure online platform is used to facilitate the collation of consent-related materials, digital health records, and responses to self-administered surveys. Participants are followed for up to 18 months, with patient-reported outcomes collected every three months via survey and linked to concurrent digital health data; follow-up includes no in-person involvement. Our planned enrollment is 4,800 participants, including 2,400 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 2,400 SARS-CoV-2 negative participants (as a concurrent comparison group). These data will allow assessment of longitudinal outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection and comparison of the relative risk of outcomes in individuals with and without infection. Patient-reported outcomes include self-reported health function and status, as well as clinical outcomes including health system encounters and new diagnoses. RESULTS: Participating sites obtained institutional review board approval. Enrollment and follow-up are ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: This study will characterize medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection among a diverse population, predictors of sequelae, and their relative risk compared to persons with similar symptomatology but without SARS-CoV-2 infection. These data may inform clinical interventions for individuals with sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2/fisiologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Terapias em Estudo/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 40(5): 559-565, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30890193

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) doffing errors on healthcare worker (HCW) contamination with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: The study was conducted at 4 adult ICUs at 1 tertiary-care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: HCWs who cared for patients on contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, or multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli were enrolled. Samples were collected from standardized areas of patient body, garb sites, and high-touch environmental surfaces in patient rooms. HCW hands, gloves, PPE, and equipment were sampled before and after patient interaction. Research personnel observed PPE doffing and coded errors based on CDC guidelines. RESULTS: We enrolled 125 HCWs; most were nurses (66.4%) or physicians (19.2%). During the study, 95 patients were on contact precautions for MRSA. Among 5,093 cultured sites (HCW, patient, environment), 652 (14.7%) yielded the target MDRO. Moreover, 45 HCWs (36%) were contaminated with the target MDRO after patient interactions, including 4 (3.2%) on hands and 38 (30.4%) on PPE. Overall, 49 HCWs (39.2%) made multiple doffing errors and were more likely to have contaminated clothes following a patient interaction (risk ratio [RR], 4.69; P = .04). All 4 HCWs with hand contamination made doffing errors. The risk of hand contamination was higher when gloves were removed before gowns during PPE doffing (RR, 11.76; P = .025). CONCLUSION: When caring for patients on CP for MDROs, HCWs appear to have differential risk for hand contamination based on their method of doffing PPE. An intervention as simple as reinforcing the preferred order of doffing may reduce HCW contamination with MDROs.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Contaminação de Equipamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Roupa de Proteção , Adulto , Idoso , Chicago/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Luvas Protetoras , Desinfecção das Mãos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto Jovem
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 39(7): 765-770, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29695310

RESUMO

OBJECTIVETo evaluate probiotics for the primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among hospital inpatients.DESIGNA before-and-after quality improvement intervention comparing 12-month baseline and intervention periods.SETTINGA 694-bed teaching hospital.INTERVENTIONWe administered a multispecies probiotic comprising L. acidophilus (CL1285), L. casei (LBC80R), and L. rhamnosus (CLR2) to eligible antibiotic recipients within 12 hours of initial antibiotic receipt through 5 days after final dose. We excluded (1) all patients on neonatal, pediatric and oncology wards; (2) all individuals receiving perioperative prophylactic antibiotic recipients; (3) all those restricted from oral intake; and (4) those with pancreatitis, leukopenia, or posttransplant. We defined CDI by symptoms plus C. difficile toxin detection by polymerase chain reaction. Our primary outcome was hospital-onset CDI incidence on eligible hospital units, analyzed using segmented regression.RESULTSThe study included 251 CDI episodes among 360,016 patient days during the baseline and intervention periods, and the incidence rate was 7.0 per 10,000 patient days. The incidence rate was similar during baseline and intervention periods (6.9 vs 7.0 per 10,000 patient days; P=.95). However, compared to the first 6 months of the intervention, we detected a significant decrease in CDI during the final 6 months (incidence rate ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.9; P=.009). Testing intensity remained stable between the baseline and intervention periods: 19% versus 20% of stools tested were C. difficile positive by PCR, respectively. From medical record reviews, only 26% of eligible patients received a probiotic per the protocol.CONCLUSIONSDespite poor adherence to the protocol, there was a reduction in the incidence of CDI during the intervention, which was delayed ~6 months after introducing probiotic for primary prevention.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;765-770.


Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Chicago/epidemiologia , Clostridioides difficile , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária
4.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 6(4): 352-359, 2017 Nov 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27856730

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common cause of healthcare-associated infection. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) (>3 classes) and carbapenem-resistant (CR) P aeruginosa are significant threats globally. We used a large reference-laboratory database to study the epidemiology of P aeruginosa in children in the United States. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility data from the Surveillance Network were used to phenotypically identify MDR and CR P aeruginosa isolates in children aged 1 to 17 years between January 1999 and July 2012. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate trends in the prevalence of MDR and CR P aeruginosa. Isolates from infants (<1 year old) and patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. RESULTS: Among the isolates tested, the crude proportion of MDR P aeruginosa increased from 15.4% in 1999 to 26% in 2012, and the proportion of CR P aeruginosa increased from 9.4% in 1999 to 20% in 2012. The proportion of both MDR and CR P aeruginosa increased each year by 4% (odds ratio [OR], 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.04] and 1.04 [95% CI, 1.04-1.05], respectively). In multivariable analysis, both MDR and CR P aeruginosa were more common in the intensive care setting, among children aged 13 to 17 years, in respiratory specimens, and in the West North Central region. In addition, resistance to other antibiotic classes (aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and piperacillin-tazobactam) often used to treat P aeruginosa increased. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of MDR and CR P aeruginosa infection in children are rising nationally. Aggressive prevention strategies, including instituting antimicrobial stewardship programs in pediatric settings, are essential for combating antimicrobial resistance.


Assuntos
Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Resistência beta-Lactâmica
6.
J Palliat Med ; 18(3): 251-8, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25469906

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With unprecedented levels of international migration, physicians in the United States may care for terminally ill patients who have strong connections to their country of origin and such patients may desire to return in the final stages of life. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we analyzed how often terminally ill patients cited travel to country of origin as a goal of care, how often travel occurred, and factors associated with successful travel. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review from January 1, 2005 through May 1, 2007. SETTING/SUBJECTS: All foreign-born patients seen by a palliative care consultation service, including inpatient and outpatient consultations, in an urban safety-net health system in the United States. MEASUREMENTS: We determined whether patients expressed a desire to travel to their country of origin and the factors, including demographics and functional status associated with travel. RESULTS: Of 336 foreign-born patients, 129 (38%) expressed a desire to travel to their country of origin; 60 (47%) successfully returned to 24 unique countries. Countries to which the largest number of patients returned were Mexico (n=14), Poland (n=11), and the Philippines (n=7). Although patients with the best functional status were most likely to travel successfully, 16 (31%) who wanted to travel despite having the worst functional status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score indicating confinement to bed or chair) traveled successfully. There were no deaths en route or flight diversions due to medical crisis; all trips were made on regularly scheduled commercial airline flights. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients in our cohort expressed a desire to return to their country of origin. We facilitated successful travel for nearly half of these patients. Our findings identify the need to include travel back to country of origin in the framework of planning care for terminally ill patients.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Etnicidade/psicologia , Características de Residência , Doente Terminal/psicologia , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35 Suppl 3: S23-31, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25222894

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the impact on healthcare costs of 3 alternative strategies for reducing bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit (ICU): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares screening and isolation, targeted decolonization (ie, screening, isolation, and decolonization of MRSA carriers or infections), and universal decolonization (ie, no screening and decolonization of all ICU patients). DESIGN: Cost analysis using decision modeling. METHODS: We developed a decision-analysis model to estimate the health care costs of targeted decolonization and universal decolonization strategies compared with a strategy of MRSA nares screening and isolation. Effectiveness estimates were derived from a recent randomized trial of the 3 strategies, and cost estimates were derived from the literature. RESULTS: In the base case, universal decolonization was the dominant strategy and was estimated to have both lower intervention costs and lower total ICU costs than either screening and isolation or targeted decolonization. Compared with screening and isolation, universal decolonization was estimated to save $171,000 and prevent 9 additional bloodstream infections for every 1,000 ICU admissions. The dominance of universal decolonization persisted under a wide range of cost and effectiveness assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of universal decolonization for patients admitted to the ICU would both reduce bloodstream infections and likely reduce healthcare costs compared with strategies of MRSA nares screening and isolation or screening and isolation coupled with targeted decolonization.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Redução de Custos , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Bacteriemia/economia , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/economia , Portador Sadio/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Cavidade Nasal/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/economia
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 54(9): 1296-303, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22354926

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined the epidemiology of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) nasal colonization among 3 groups of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and 1 group of HIV-negative outpatients. METHODS: We determined prevalence and risk factors associated with MRSA colonization among women, recently incarcerated, and Hispanic HIV-infected patients and HIV-negative patients; isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Relative prevalence was calculated using Poisson regression, and logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 601 patients, 9.3% were colonized with MRSA; 11% of HIV-infected and 4.2% of HIV-negative patients were colonized (relative prevalence, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-6.07; P = .03). Among HIV-infected patients, recently incarcerated patients had the highest colonization prevalence (15.6%) followed by women (12%); Hispanic patients had the lowest (2.8%). Eighty percent of confirmed MRSA isolates were identified as USA300. On multivariate analysis, history of incarceration or residence in alternative housing (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.7; P = .03) was associated with MRSA colonization; Hispanic ethnicity was negatively associated (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, .11-.98; P = .045). There was a trend (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, .9-3.0; P = .097) toward geographic location of residence being associated with colonization. After controlling for incarceration, residence, and geography, HIV status was no longer significantly associated with colonization. CONCLUSIONS: The CA-MRSA and HIV epidemics have intersected. Examination of networks of individuals released from incarceration, both HIV positive and negative, is needed to assess the role of social networks in spread of CA-MRSA and inform prevention strategies.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/complicações , HIV/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Nariz/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/complicações , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Feminino , Genótipo , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Masculino , Resistência a Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nariz/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenótipo , Prevalência , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 32(8): 775-83, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21768761

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether longitudinal insurer claims data allow reliable identification of elevated hospital surgical site infection (SSI) rates. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in US hospitals performing at least 80 procedures in 2005. Hospitals were assigned to deciles by using case mix-adjusted probabilities of having an SSI-related inpatient or outpatient claim code within 60 days of surgery. We then reviewed medical records of randomly selected patients to assess whether chart-confirmed SSI risk was higher in hospitals in the worst deciles compared with the best deciles. PARTICIPANTS: Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who underwent CABG in these hospitals in 2005. RESULTS: We evaluated 114,673 patients who underwent CABG in 671 hospitals. In the best decile, 7.8% (958/12,307) of patients had an SSI-related code, compared with 24.8% (2,747/11,068) in the worst decile ([Formula: see text]). Medical record review confirmed SSI in 40% (388/980) of those with SSI-related codes. In the best decile, the chart-confirmed annual SSI rate was 3.2%, compared with 9.4% in the worst decile, with an adjusted odds ratio of SSI of 2.7 (confidence interval, 2.2-3.3; [Formula: see text]) for CABG performed in a worst-decile hospital compared with a best-decile hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Claims data can identify groups of hospitals with unusually high or low post-CABG SSI rates. Assessment of claims is more reproducible and efficient than current surveillance methods. This example of secondary use of routinely recorded electronic health information to assess quality of care can identify hospitals that may benefit from prevention programs.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(10): 1057-62, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20715975

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during a 2-state monoclonal outbreak. DESIGN: Multicenter observational study. Setting. Four tertiary care hospitals and 1 long-term acute care hospital. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was conducted for all consecutive patients during the period January 1, 2005, through April 30, 2006, for whom 1 or more blood cultures yielded carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. RESULTS: We identified 86 patients from the 16-month study period. Their mortality rate was 41%; of the 35 patients who died, one-third (13) had positive blood culture results for carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii at the time of death. Risk factors associated with mortality were intensive care unit stay, malignancy, and presence of fever and/or hypotension at the time blood sample for culture was obtained. Only 5 patients received adequate empirical antibiotic treatment, but the choice of treatment did not affect mortality. Fifty-seven patients (66.2%) had a single positive blood culture result for carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii; the only factor associated with a single positive blood culture result was the presence of decubitus ulcers. Interestingly, during the study period, a transition from single to multiple positive blood culture results was observed. Four patients, 3 of whom were in a burn intensive care unit, were bacteremic for more than 30 days (range, 36-86 days). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first time a study has described 2 patterns of bloodstream infection with A. baumannii: single versus multiple positive blood culture results, as well as a subset of patients with prolonged bacteremia.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Surtos de Doenças , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/mortalidade , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Sangue/microbiologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Meios de Cultura , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
13.
BMC Infect Dis ; 10: 225, 2010 Jul 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20667139

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: When Staphylococcus aureus is isolated in urine, it is thought to usually represent hematogenous spread. Because such spread might have special clinical significance, we evaluated predictors and outcomes of S. aureus bacteriuria among patients with S. aureus bacteremia. METHODS: A case-control study was performed at John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County among adult inpatients during January 2002-December 2006. Cases and controls had positive and negative urine cultures, respectively, for S. aureus, within 72 hours of positive blood culture for S. aureus. Controls were sampled randomly in a 1:4 ratio. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done. RESULTS: Overall, 59% of patients were African-American, 12% died, 56% of infections had community-onset infections, and 58% were infected with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). Among 61 cases and 247 controls, predictors of S. aureus bacteriuria on multivariate analysis were urological surgery (OR = 3.4, p = 0.06) and genitourinary infection (OR = 9.2, p = 0.002). Among patients who died, there were significantly more patients with bacteriuria than among patients who survived (39% vs. 17%; p = 0.002). In multiple Cox regression analysis, death risks in bacteremic patients were bacteriuria (hazard ratio 2.9, CI 1.4-5.9, p = 0.004), bladder catheter use (2.0, 1.0-4.0, p = 0.06), and Charlson score (1.1, 1.1-1.3, p = 0.02). Neither length of stay nor methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection was a predictor of S. aureus bacteriuria or death. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with S. aureus bacteremia, those with S. aureus bacteriuria had 3-fold higher mortality than those without bacteriuria, even after adjustment for comorbidities. Bacteriuria may identify patients with more severe bacteremia, who are at risk of worse outcomes.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/complicações , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/complicações , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 49(8): 1175-84, 2009 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19739972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Organisms resistant to antimicrobials continue to emerge and spread. This study was performed to measure the medical and societal cost attributable to antimicrobial-resistant infection (ARI). METHODS: A sample of high-risk hospitalized adult patients was selected. Measurements included ARI, total cost, duration of stay, comorbidities, acute pathophysiology, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, intensive care unit stay, surgery, health care-acquired infection, and mortality. Hospital services used and outcomes were abstracted from electronic and written medical records. Medical costs were measured from the hospital perspective. A sensitivity analysis including 3 study designs was conducted. Regression was used to adjust for potential confounding in the random sample and in the sample expanded with additional patients with ARI. Propensity scores were used to select matched control subjects for each patient with ARI for a comparison of mean cost for patients with and without ARI. RESULTS: In a sample of 1391 patients, 188 (13.5%) had ARI. The medical costs attributable to ARI ranged from $18,588 to $29,069 per patient in the sensitivity analysis. Excess duration of hospital stay was 6.4-12.7 days, and attributable mortality was 6.5%. The societal costs were $10.7-$15.0 million. Using the lowest estimates from the sensitivity analysis resulted in a total cost of $13.35 million in 2008 dollars in this patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The attributable medical and societal costs of ARI are considerable. Data from this analysis could form the basis for a more comprehensive evaluation of the cost of resistance and the potential economic benefits of prevention programs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/economia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , APACHE , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/mortalidade , Chicago , Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Política Organizacional
16.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 44(4): 435-42, 2007 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17224850

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare HIV screening and provider-referred diagnostic testing as strategies for detecting undiagnosed HIV infection in an urban emergency department (ED). METHODS: From January 2003 through April 2004, study staff offered HIV screening with rapid tests to ED patients regardless of risks or symptoms. ED providers could also refer patients for diagnostic testing. Patients aged 18 to 54 years without known HIV infection were eligible. RESULTS: Of 4849 eligible patients approached for screening, 2824 (58%) accepted and were tested; 414 (95%) of 436 provider-referred patients accepted and were tested. Thirty-five (1.2%) screened patients and 48 (11.6%) provider-referred patients were infected with HIV (P < 0.001). Of these, 18 (51%) screened patients and 24 (50%) referred patients reported no traditional risk factors; 27 (77%) screened patients and 38 (79%) referred patients entered HIV care. Of HIV-infected patients with CD4 cell counts available, 14 (45%) of 31 screened patients and 37 (82%) of 45 provider-referred patients had <200 cells/microL (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ED screening detects HIV infection and links to care patients who may not be tested through risk- or symptom-based strategies. The diagnostic yield was higher among provider-referred patients, but screening detected patients earlier in the course of disease.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Chicago , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Arch Intern Med ; 165(17): 1956-60, 2005 Sep 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16186464

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rapid testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has improved HIV screening in the outpatient and perinatal settings, but few data report how it may be used to improve the quality of inpatient care. We compared quality of care for inpatients diagnosed in the emergency department via rapid testing vs patients whose conditions were diagnosed via conventional testing during their hospital admission. METHODS: We reviewed medical records to identify patients with first-time positive HIV tests and concurrent hospital admission who were tested via either rapid testing in the emergency department or conventional testing during their hospital admission. We compared quality-of-care end points for these patients. RESULTS: We identified 103 HIV-infected inpatients with no previous HIV diagnosis; the conditions of 48 patients (47%) were diagnosed by rapid testing and 55 (53%) by conventional testing. Mean length of stay was 6 days for the rapid test group vs 13 days for the conventional test group (P<.001); multivariate regression analysis showed that testing modality had an independent, statistically significant effect on length of stay. Nine (16%) of the patients in the conventional test group vs none in the rapid test group were discharged without receiving their HIV test results (P = .002). Patients in the rapid test group attended the outpatient HIV clinic in a mean of 22 days vs 50 days for the conventional test group patients (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid HIV testing in the emergency department preceding admission may shorten hospital stay, increase the number of newly diagnosed patients with HIV who are discharged from the hospital aware of their HIV status, and improve entry into outpatient care for patients admitted at the time of their initial HIV diagnosis.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 37(11): 1549-55, 2003 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14614679

RESUMO

In the late 1980s, Medicaid-insured human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) were 40% less likely to undergo diagnostic bronchoscopy and 75% more likely to die than were privately insured patients, whereas rates of use of other, less resource-intensive aspects of PCP care were similar. We reviewed 1395 medical records at 59 hospitals in 6 cities for the period 1995-1997 to examine the impact of insurance status on PCP-related care. Medicaid patients were only one-half as likely to undergo diagnostic bronchoscopy as were privately insured patients, yet we found no evidence that mortality was greater among patients who received empirical treatment. The bronchoscopy rates were primarily related to patients' personal insurance status. A weaker hospital-level effect was seen that was related to hospitals' Medicaid/private insurance case mix ratios. The situation has evolved from one in which Medicaid coverage was associated with underuse of bronchoscopy and poorer survival among empirically treated persons with HIV-related PCP to one in which empirical therapy is effective in treating this disease and expensive diagnostic procedures may be overused for privately insured patients.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Seguro Saúde , Medicaid , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/mortalidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/mortalidade , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/terapia , Idoso , Broncoscopia , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Infecções por HIV/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/terapia , Taxa de Sobrevida
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 37(1): 59-64, 2003 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12830409

RESUMO

Redundant antibiotic combinations are a potentially remediable source of antibiotic overuse. At a public teaching hospital, we determined the incidence, cost, and indications for such combinations and measured the effects of a pharmacist-based intervention. Of 1189 inpatients receiving >or=2 antibiotics, computer-assisted screening identified 192 patients (16.1%) receiving potentially redundant combinations. Chart reviews showed that 137 episodes (71%) were inappropriate. Physician overprescribing errors were found in 77 episodes (56%); most involved redundant coverage for gram-positive or anaerobic organisms. In 76 episodes (55%), lapses in the medication ordering and distribution system led to the persistence in the pharmacy records of regimens no longer active according to the patient charts. The incidence of redundant antibiotic combinations was significantly higher in the intensive care unit and surgery services, compared with medical services. Interventions to discontinue redundant agents were successful in 134 (98%) of the 137 episodes. Potential drug cost savings and reduction in redundant antibiotic combination days were 10,800 dollars and 584 days, respectively; pharmacist time for patient review and intervention cost 2880 dollars. Use of redundant antibiotic combinations was common, and a pharmacist-based intervention was feasible, with a potential annualized cost savings of 48,000 dollars.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Computadores , Quimioterapia Combinada/economia , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Custos e Análise de Custo , Coleta de Dados , Uso de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos , Farmacêuticos , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA